One of the meanest things women do

When I see an attractive woman, I feel like fucking her, and when I see her again 1 hour later, I will still feel like fucking her, and when I see her again 1 day later, I will still feel like fucking her, and when I see her again 1 week later, I will still feel like fucking her, and when I see her again 1 year later, I will still feel like fucking her.

The women are quite different. You have had an awesomely successful evening. You have gotten her so horny that she looks like she'll let you stick it anywhere you want. The only problem is that one of you has to leave (I mean, like, really has to), or, more likely, you simply have no access to a private place. You think "no big deal", because she so obviously desires you that you are convinced that there is an agreement between you that you will tear off each other's clothes and devour each other's bodies the moment you'll get the chance.

But when you meet her the next day or a few days later, and you're like "well, your place this evening?", she'll be like "look, maybe you misunderstood me".

In other words, you, like, have her seduced 95%, but a day or two later, you can't go on from that 95%, or even 90 or 80 or 70% – you're back to something like 10%. Your brilliant achievement the other night was for nothing. You'll have to do all the work again.

When I was made a fool like that for the third time, I finally realised that that's just what women do. That is, intellectually realised. Emotionally, I don't think I can never understand this kind of mind-blowing, earth-shattering insincerity and untrustworthiness of women. And need I say that yet another chunk of my heart (a rather large one this time) turned from flesh to stone?

To try to look at the bright side – getting abused like that helps one get over any scruples about taking advantage of women whenever one can. I mean, those creatures deserve no honesty or fairness whatsoever. It's hard to imagine anything (anything legal, that is) I could do to a woman that would be as mean as that.

Countries ranked by the women's beauty

 

  1) Colombia 7.45

  2) Portugal 7.30

  3) Serbia 7.22

  4) Russia 6.97

  5) Italy 6.90

  6) Croatia 6.82

  7) Venezuela 6.80

  8) Romania 6.70

  9) Dominican Republic 6.65

10) Moldova 6.65

11) Philippines 6.62

12) Macedonia 6.55

13) Thailand 6.47

14) Slovakia 6.45

15) Belarus 6.40

16) Greece 6.25

17) Czech Republic 6.25

18) Malaysia 6.25

19) Bulgaria 6.17

20) Argentina 6.12

21) Mexico 6.10

22) Ireland 6.10

23) Japan 6.10

24) Canada 6.10

25) New Zealand 6.07

26) Cuba 6.07

27) Ukraine 6.07

28) Poland 6.05

29) Brazil 6.02

30) Costa Rica 6.02

31) Taiwan 5.97

32) Qatar 5.92

33) China 5.85

34) Germany 5.80

35) UAE 5.70

36) Malta 5.65

37) Belgium 5.62

38) Latvia 5.57

39) Cape Verde 5.47

40) South Africa 5.47

41) Norway 5.45

42) Algeria 5.45

43) Singapore 5.45

44) Lithuania 5.42

45) France 5.35

46) Sweden 5.27

47) Hungary 5.27

48) Slovenia 5.22

49) Netherlands 5.20

50) Mongolia 5.17

51) Tunesia 5.15

52) Spain 5.12

53) Turkey 5.07

54) Switzerland 5.02

55) Hong Kong 5.00

56) Western Sahara 4.97

57) Dominica 4.97

58) USA 4.95

59) Montenegro 4.80

60) Austria 4.75

61) Jersey 4.62

62) Finland 4.52

63) Australia 4.50

64) Luxemburg 4.40

65) Chile 4.37

66) UK 4.32

67) Morocco 4.27

68) Vietnam 4.27

69) Gibraltar 4.27

70) Kenya 4.25

71) Honduras 4.10

72) Peru 4.10

73) Bolivia 3.90

74) Kyrgyzstan 3.82

75) Estonia 3.67

76) Namibia 3.62

77) Panama 3.57

78) Saint Kitts and Nevis 3.20

79) Ecuador 2.95

80) Vatican 2.40*

(40 women from each country; each woman rated 1 to 10; country's score computed as the average of those)

* Vatican's score is based on 5 photos only, because I couldn't find more.

Explanations

Background

It started as a part of another project but soon acquired a life of its own. I mean, I was really curious to find out which country in the world has the most beautiful women.

Method

How can one find out how beautiful is an average woman in one or another country? It would seem that, short of travelling to a country after country and checking out the women in person, the most accurate means is by finding a number of photos of women on the Internet and rating them.

As a matter of fact, there is an astounding number of online discussions where one guy would post a couple of photos of, say, Italian women, believing they will convince everyone that the Italian women are the most beautiful in the world, and then another guy would say "no, the Venezuelan women are the most beautiful in the world", and, to "prove" it, post a couple of photos of Venezuelan women. That is obviously not a way of getting anywhere. I tried to find something more objective.

So I defined a certain search algorithm and I defined requirements for picture quality, with the goal of finding photos of 40 women from each country without spending unreasonably much time.

Then I rated each woman with 1 to 10 points and calculated the average for each country.

Choice of countries

My research includes only a minority of the world's countries. That is because I only included countries that had at least some interest for me as travel destinations. I mean, I couldn't care less if Yemen, Guinea-Bissau or Suriname disappeared from the face of the Earth tomorrow, so I would hardly have any motivation to search for photos of women from there.

What is a country?

I count a territory as a country if it has its own Internet domain suffix. Thus, Jersey, French Polynesia and Western Sahara are countries; Martinique, Northern Cyprus and Kosovo aren't. That is absolutely not to be interpreted as an expression of any political sympathies.

What is a woman?

Obviously, I discarded children. Whenever the age was not indicated (and that was usually the case), I just looked at the girl and if I even suspected that she might be a child, I discarded the photo.

I also discarded women who were clearly too old to be considered sex objects.

Choice of photos

Admitting that a certain amount of subconscious whoreness bias was probably just humanly unavoidable, I consciously gave my best to discard photos only based on picture quality and the woman's apparent age, rather than keep pretty ones and discard ugly ones.

I gave my best reasonable effort to eliminate multiple photos of the same woman, but the Orientals were really tough to tell apart, so I might have made some mistakes there.

I discarded celebrities, because I might have been tempted to evaluate their reputation rather than beauty, and that would have distorted the results. (By the way, it was weird how Google searches for virtually any country's women kept turning out photos of Rihanna.)

In course of the selection process, I ended up setting stricter quality standards for photos of professional models, compared to regular people. There were two reasons to that. Firstly, the photos of professional models were so numerous. Secondly, in some countries (most strikingly, Thailand) the models you see on billboards and in magazines look very different from the actual women you see on the street. So I didn't want them to dominate too much.

The idea behind this survey was to give an idea as to in which country a traveller or expat could hope to find the most beautiful women. That's why, when a woman was from the country A and the photo was taken in the country B, I counted the photo for the country B, even if the woman was just travelling. By the way, I was amazed to notice how the Russian whores seem to have found their way to most countries of the world. Well, nothing doing. If Yekaterina lives in Malta, I count her as a woman in Malta.

Credibility

I gave my best reasonable effort to make sure that the photos were actually from those countries. Of course, I had to rely on the information provided on third party websites, so if they were lying, that would have distorted the survey results, but there was nothing I could do to avoid that. I believe it's reasonable to expect that most websites don't lie about the origin of their photos. (I found several that do, and blacklisted them, of course. Strangely enough, some websites that sell photos lie shamelessly about the model's nationality.)

Obviously the ratings given to individual women are totally subjective and reflect my personal taste only. I have seen many astonishing examples of different men's having extremely different preferences on women. There was no way to avoid this subjectivity, and I did this for myself anyway. Should that be not good enough for someone, they are welcome to conduct their own, more objective survey, if they so desire.

Comments on results

I rated the photos in random order, not country by country, so when I began to add up the points, I had little idea of what the outcome would be. Some results were quite surprising.

While wondering which country might turn out to be the overall winner, I spent no thought at all on Colombia, but to think of it, I've seen remarkably beautiful women from that country, so its victory is not all that surprising.

What doesn't make sense at all, though, is that Montenegro and Serbia should have so different results – or, for that matter, Dominica and St. Kitts & Nevis. Or Australia and New Zealand.

The very low rankings of Bolivia, Peru and Ecuador are not surprising, considering that they have large Amerind populations and I find the Amerind women the least attractive of all. What doesn't fit in at all, though, is Mexico scoring approximately as high as Cuba. The population of Mexico is mostly Mediterranean-Amerind mix, and the one of Cuba is mostly Mediterranean-Negro mix, and when I visited those two countries, I was amazed at the ugliness of Mexican women compared to Cuban ones – or, for that matter, to any other country where I've been. I mean, the German women just don't take care of themselves, but the Mexican women are really ugly.

It might also rise an eyebrow or two that Panama has scored so low, compared to Colombia and Costa Rica. That is apparently because among the photos of Panamanian women on the Internet, too many are pictures of Amerinds taken by the tourists, while the dominant group in Colombia and Costa Rica are photos of chicks in search for US husbands. Well, can't be helped. I could hardly have begun to discard photos based on race, could I?

(By the way, the tourists' obsession with minority groups is probably also the reason why Namibia's score turned out so much lower than South Africa's.)

I already mentioned Germany, the country full of ugly women, the country where people use in all seriousness the term Schönheitswahn (beauty-mania), considering foreign women's pursuit of beauty and foreign men's preference for beautiful women to be some sort of a collective mental disease. So it's implausible that Germany would score clearly higher than Austria and almost as high as the Czech Republic, whereas in the real world the contrast between the Austrian and Czech women's beauty and the German women's ugliness is striking. But again, nothing doing. I rated photos individually and it would have been grossly unfair to penalise photos of German women on the grounds that most German women are actually not that pretty.

Thailand and the Philippines scored almost equally in this survey. In the real life, though, I assure you that the Filipina women are very much more beautiful than the Thai women. There is absolutely no comparison. Neither are Thai women any prettier than Vietnamese women, it's rather the other way around. I also think that Mongolia should have scored higher – at any rate, in the real world I've found Nothern Oriental women clearly prettier on average than Southern Oriental ones. The reason to those illogicalities is obvious – some Oriental countries are overflowing the Internet with photos of hand-picked extraordinary beauties (often surgery-enhanced) who look nothing like the vast majority of the women in those countries. So a random selection from Google search results is not always a representative picture of a country's womanhood, especially so in East Asia.

And last but not least, I was shocked by the extremely low score of my native country, Estonia. I admit that I am thoroughly fed up with the Estonian women's ever-increasing arrogance, but as to their physical beauty, I never expected I would rate it so low compared to that of Russian, Latvian and Swedish, and even Finnish women. Now, as I mentioned, the German women look ugly because of their wide-spread disregard and even contempt of personal style, but in Finland there seems to be an outright feminist conspiracy with the aim of choosing one's clothes and accessories so as to make oneself look as ugly as possible. There is no denying that the Estonian women have gotten clearly uglier during the last decade or two, obviously because they imitate the horrible personal style choices that are fashionable in Finland. However, they are nowhere near as ugly as the Finns themselves. This survey, though, says the opposite.

All in all, those illogical results suggest that 40 women per country are too few. They also seem to suggest that an Internet search engine is not the best means of acquiring women's photos for such a purpose. Still, those results are better than nothing and they're the best there are so far.

Future

I am planning to increase my database to 100 women from each country, and sooner or later I'm likely to add a couple dozen more countries. I have ideas how to make sure the results won't be dominated either by professional models or by minority groups fancied by tourists.

However, I have many other things to do, so I will only be spending a little time on this project occasionally when I feel like it. Therefore, the new ratings won't be there any time soon.

I've been suggested that I sell my database of photos. That is absolutely out of the question. The reason is very simple: the photos are presumably copyrighted and it would be against the law for me to distribute them. I would have to contact each photo's copyright owner and ask him for a permission. That would obviously be a grossly unreasonable amount of effort.

It would have been easy to solve the economic crisis

Let us, for a moment, be very naive and idealistic and imagine a USA that was governed by politicians who actually wanted the best for the people and the country, rather than themselves and their buddies. What they could have done to solve the economic crisis of 2008 much better than the actual US government did, is this:

They could have rounded up everyone involved in the making of the crisis, and told them: we know you caused the crisis, and you know you caused the crisis, but we both know that what you did was technically not against the law, so we can't legally put you in prison for making millions of people into beggars. Therefore, we are giving you this choice: a) you hand over 90% of your and your family members' assets and we'll let you go; b) we'll use one thousandth of the proposed bailout money to hire the best detectives to rip your professional and private lives apart, starting from the richer and going down to the poorer, and for every, even the tiniest, misdeed you ever did, we are going to charge you with the severest crime we can, ask for the harshest punishment the law permits, and sue you for the biggest amount of damages we can.

I think most crooks involved in the real estate bubble would have had enough skeletons in their closets to eagerly give up the overwhelming part of their wealth (and still keep far more than any person can spend in his lifetime). The nation would have recovered many billions of dollars, maybe not enough to cover all the damage, but the psychological impact to the common people would have been huge.

Then it would have been easy to say to the people: see, we made the crooks pay and recovered so-and-so-much of the damage. However, we are going to use the money to help the people who are really in a desperate situation, like the ones who have no roof over their heads. We are not going to hand over taxpayers' money to those who merely lost the profits they were expecting on their speculations. And all those cry-babies who believed they were entitled to living in luxury on borrowed money forever, shut the fuck up and learn this new way of life: consume only as much as you have earned with your work.

Don't invest in women

Recently I came, yet again, across a bunch of articles offering generic advice for Western men hooking up with Thai girls. It's not like I'm looking for that kind of information. I have quite adequate first-hand knowledge and I know better information sources for learning more. No, it's just that sometimes when you're looking for something, you find something else.

Anyway, that brought my thoughts back to the subject of Western men being overwhelmed by the "Adult Disneyland". Many of them are doing incredibly stupid things like a child let loose in a candy factory might. Then there's a number of men giving other men tips on avoiding some unbelievabaly stupid mistakes in Thailand. And finally, there's another category of men who seem to greatly enjoy true stories about horrible things that have happened to Farangs in Thailand.

Some of the advice given is very impractical, like "don't fall in love", as if we ever chose to fall in love. Some overflow the readers with unnecessary cultural advice, like behaviour rules which are supposed to be absolutely necessary when dealing with Thais – except that when you have learned it all, you will see that the Thais themselves don't follow those rules. There is actually very little to learn. Don't give things with your left hand, never show the middle finger, never say "fuck you" – that is pretty much the only etiquette you'll need in Thailand, apart from keeping your eyes open and following the elementary rules of respectfulness, like a sensible person would do in pretty much every country.

As to dealing with Thai women, I came to think of one rule which I believe is the most important. I mean, there is absolutely nothing wrong with your reading several books on Thai culture. But if you don't want to bother with that just yet, there is one rule of thumb which is easy to remember and ought to keep you from losing your heart and your shirt.

The rule is: "Don't invest in a woman."

It means that the normal way of things is: she gives something to you, you give something to her. Avoid giving something to women for the mere hope of getting something in return in the future. No honey, no money. Panties down before money down.

In fact, that is a good policy even with the women back home, except that it's extremely hard to follow. In the West, it's commonly accepted that a man is supposed to invest a lot in the woman and she might return the favours or not, and there is nothing the man can do about it. That's a biological thing which has perfectly plausible reasons, but I am not going into details here. What is important for you to realise is that in Thailand we are not required to do that. We don't have to pay for hopes. We even pay for sex after we've fucked the chick. That's unheard of in Europe.

Sure enough, I've taken a Thai bargirl out on a dinner, and she chose the restaurant, and it was rather expensive for Thai standards, and of course I paid. But that was only after I had fucked her. I didn't take her to a nice expensive restaurant in order to make her like me more so that maybe she would reward me with sex someday. No, I took her out to dinner because while in bed with her I took a liking in her as a person, and I figured she was good enough for more than sex. I agreed to her choice of restaurant because I liked it. The money I spent was absolutely worth the food I ate and the good time I had in pleasant surroundings with a pretty girl who was kind to me.

That's the way to go. Whenever giving something, ask yourself occasionally: am I getting what I'm paying for?

Some argue that it's not quite "panties down before money down" in Thailand either. They would (correctly) point out that when you go into a bar in Thailand, you are required to buy a drink, and (more or less gently) pushed to buy one or two for the girls as well. I say: but you are getting something in return immediately – you are approached by scantily clad friendly pretty women, you get to touch them, and you are not the one who has to struggle to make conversation – they are. Isn't that worth the price of a couple of drinks? I say it is, totally.

Then, you pay the bar fine before you get to screw the chick, but isn't that worth being provided the environment where you can comfortably and unhurriedly check out a score of women, almost each one of whom is eager to be taken away by you? I think it is. Totally.

So those examples don't violate the principle "don't invest in a woman". What does is flying back home and sending money to "your" chick in Thailand so that she would go to school and give up prostitution, and to hire a detective to spy on her. (I saw a guy in Bangkok who provides exactly that service.) When you fuck her, give her money. When you don't fuck her, what the fuck are you giving her money for? If you want her for your wife, accept her for what she is. What is the point trying to change a prostitute into an innocent woman? If you want an innocent woman for a wife, go to an agency and buy a virgin, instead of sending the same amount of money to a bargirl and worrying yourself sick that she might still be sleeping with someone else.

What exactly is investing and what isn't? There is this test. If she would die or disappear or get married this moment, would you feel that the money, time and emotions you spent on her were more or less adequately compensated by whatever you got back from her? Or would you think: dammit, now it's all wasted?

Needless to say, that's a good question to occasionally ask yourself with the girls back home, too.